Tag Archive | leadership

INCIDENT MANAGEMENT AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT

Incident management and crisis management are two important components of Business Continuity Management (BCM). They are distinct but interconnected aspects of an organization’s strategy for handling disruptions and maintaining essential operations. Here’s an overview of each:

Incident Management:
Definition: Incident management is the process of responding to and resolving day-to-day disruptions, issues, and minor events that have the potential to disrupt normal business operations. These incidents can include IT outages, equipment failures, minor security breaches, or other disruptions that affect business processes.
Scope: Incident management focuses on the immediate and short-term response to events, with the primary goal of minimizing the impact and restoring normal operations as quickly as possible.

Key Objectives:
Minimizing Disruption: The main objective is to limit the impact of the incident and maintain essential operations.
Response and Recovery: Actions are taken to address the incident, mitigate its effects, and restore normal business processes.
Documentation: Incidents are typically well-documented for analysis and improvement.
Examples: Examples of incidents include a server crash, a minor data breach, a power outage, or a localized IT system failure.

Crisis Management:
Definition: Crisis management, on the other hand, deals with major and often unexpected events that have the potential to seriously disrupt or even threaten an organization’s survival. These events can include natural disasters, cyberattacks, public relations crises, financial meltdowns, or other severe disruptions.

Scope: Crisis management involves planning for and responding to events that go beyond the scope of regular incident management and have the potential to affect the organization at a broader level.

Key Objectives:
Maintaining Organizational Survival: The primary goal is to ensure the organization’s survival and protect its reputation, people, and assets.
Communication and Coordination: Crisis management involves clear and effective communication with stakeholders, coordination of resources, and making strategic decisions.
Recovery and Continuity: The focus is on stabilizing the situation and ensuring essential functions can continue.
Examples: Examples of crises include a major data breach affecting customer data, a natural disaster such as a hurricane or earthquake, a significant product recall, or a public scandal.
In summary, incident management is concerned with the day-to-day handling of minor disruptions, focusing on a quick response and recovery. Crisis management, in contrast, deals with major, often unexpected events that have the potential to severely impact the organization, requiring a more strategic, coordinated, and long-term approach to ensure the organization’s survival and recovery. Both are essential components of a comprehensive Business Continuity Management (BCM) plan, with incident management often serving as a building block for crisis management preparedness.

SUN TZU’s LEADERSHIP PRINCIPLES


Leadership is a matter of intelligence, trustworthiness, humaneness, courage, and discipline. Reliance
on intelligence alone results in rebelliousness. Exercise of humaneness alone results in weakness.
Fixation on trust results in folly. Dependence on the strength of courage results in violence. Excessive
discipline and sternness in command result in cruelty. When one has all five virtues together, each appropriate to its function, then one can be a leader.

— Sun Tzu

Sun Tzu’s Art of War originally was intended to be read as a work of military strategy and philosophy.
Yet even today, more than 2,000 years later, Sun Tzu’s description of the traits that characterize a successful leader is valid in any arena—war, politics, business, and any endeavor that requires the ability to inspire and mobilize the efforts of a group in the service of a common goal.

What kind of person is the theoretical ideal leader?

The ideal leader has the intelligence to understand the subtleties and complexity of the leadership
role: It is not sufficient to bear the title and hold the authority of a leader to function as one. The very
concept of leadership is subjective, which is why so many different varieties and degrees of leadership are
evident in society and in business. The perfect leader understands what it means to lead, and to be led.
The ideal leader is aware of the mutual responsibility of the leader and the led: Each relies on and supports the other.

A leader without a sense of humanity is only a leader by virtue of superior power, while a great leader inspires more by force of character and principle than by fear and intimidation.

The ideal leader is also someone who can be trusted. The essence of trust and trustworthiness is the necessity of interdependence. If a leader loses the confidence of those who follow, they will cease to
follow; if a leader fails to trust the skills of those who follow, the result will be disaster. No one can lead
alone; the concept is absurd.

A successful leader is courageous, and not simply in the physical sense. Many decisions must be made
in solitude, even when the leader has numerous counselors. The perfect leader is one who willingly takes on the responsibility for advancing or retreating, and accepts the consequences. If the leader is not seen
to have the courage required to act on behalf of all, the leader will lose the confidence of the group, and
ultimately the position of leadership itself.

Finally, the perfect leader must impose discipline, in the classic sense of teaching followers the correct
path. Discipline is not simply exercising control and punishing those who fail to obey instructions.
Discipline is guidance, structure, training; without it, no one can lead effectively.

Sun Tzu pointed out that each of the qualities he mentions as essential for leadership can lead to excess and abuse. It is only by balancing the proportions of these qualities that the leader can attain
maximum effectiveness.